Client Results

What happens when
timber treatment goes wrong.

Two anonymised cases from construction clients in Sri Lanka — the problem they arrived with, what we found, what we did, and the outcome years later.

VPI Treatment · Construction

Failed VPI Treatment Reversed — 7 Years Pest-Free

The Situation

A construction company had their structural timber vacuum pressure impregnated by another provider. Within a relatively short period, the timber showed signs of pest contamination — evidence that the treatment had not been carried out correctly. The preservative had not penetrated to the wood core, leaving the timber unprotected despite having been treated and paid for.

The Problem with the Original Treatment

Proper VPI requires a sustained vacuum to evacuate air from wood cells, followed by preservative forced in at high pressure — typically 10 bar (145 PSI) — and held for several hours. If either the vacuum stage or the pressure stage is cut short, the preservative saturates the surface only. The core remains untreated. This is difficult to detect visually, which is why substandard treatment often isn't discovered until pests establish themselves.

What We Did

St. Xavier Timber assessed the contaminated timber and carried out a full re-treatment: a complete VPI cycle using 5% Boron Borax at 10 bar, followed by kiln drying to stabilise moisture content. The timber was returned to the client with our standard warranty against pest contamination.

The Result
7 years
without a single pest complaint

It has been close to seven years since the re-treatment was completed. The client has reported no pest issues of any kind. The warranty remains in place.

Key Takeaway

VPI treatment that has not been done correctly provides no protection — and can give false confidence that the timber is safe. If your treated timber is showing pest activity, have the moisture and treatment records checked before assuming the wood itself is at fault.

Kiln Drying · Construction

Timber Sold as Kiln-Dried at 56% Moisture — Redried and Stable for 5 Years

The Situation

A construction company purchased timber that was represented by the supplier as kiln-dried and ready for use. Within a few weeks of installation, the timber began to warp and crack visibly — behaviour consistent with timber that has lost moisture rapidly after installation in a drier environment.

What We Found

When the timber arrived at St. Xavier Timber, we measured the moisture content. It was above 56%. Properly kiln-dried structural timber should be at 12–15% moisture content. At 56%, this timber was closer to freshly cut green wood than to dried stock. The rapid moisture loss after installation — as the wood tried to equalise with the surrounding environment — was the direct cause of the warping and cracking.

What We Did

We ran the timber through a full kiln drying cycle, taking it from above 56% moisture content down to 15%. The drying schedule was calibrated for the species and thickness to prevent stress cracking during the drying process itself. Moisture was verified at multiple points across the load before release.

The Result
5 years
no warping or cracking reported

Five years after the timber was correctly dried and returned, the client has reported no warping, cracking, or dimensional movement. The timber has performed as correctly kiln-dried timber should.

Key Takeaway

Kiln-dried timber can only be verified by measuring moisture content — not by asking the supplier. If you are purchasing large volumes for structural use, request a moisture reading at intake or bring a sample to us before installation begins.

Not sure if your timber has been treated correctly?

Bring a sample to our facility in Daluwakotuwa and we will measure the moisture content and assess the treatment — at no charge. Or call us with your specifications.